Self Defense Insurance For Concealed Carry In Dist of Columbia
With the rapid growth of personal concealed carry holders in Dist of Columbia and in the United States there have been a significant number of organizations and insurance companies that are beginning to provide traditional style insurance, at first review it may seem like a good idea yet when you research into it further you soon will realize that in almost every case you still have to pay out-of-pocket expenses, and then seek your reimbursement. Ask yourself a one very serious question, do I really have an extra $100,000 just lying around the house that I can totally risk in possibly being paid back?
With any traditional insurance policies in Dist of Columbia, they are only designed in assisting you in monetary reimbursement, and in all honestly nothing more. So how does any regular insurance policy really help you win in your personal case in court, the answer is simple and blunt, it can't! That is why we support CCW Safe's Self Defense Insurnace for all Concealed Carry permit holders.
Self Defense Insurance Is Needed In Dist of Columbia If You Plan To Get A CCW Permit!
If you are one of the responsible citizens that carry a firearm in Dist of Columbia for self-defense of yourself and your family, or if you're even considering caring a concealed weapon one very important factor you must consider are the legal ramifications after a shooting incident, how do you plan to protect yourself in the event of a civil or criminal court proceedings where you could end up as the defendant.
No matter how justified you feel you were in using deadly force to protect yourself, you could face a unfriendly local prosecutor looking to make a name for themselves in Dist of Columbia, and you could end up a political pawn!
Regardless of whether you are being sued by the family of the attacker in civil court or are facing criminal charges in Dist of Columbia one thing for sure is you will have an enormous amount of debt as a result of any court case. Simply put any legal representation is extremely expensive, regardless of whether or not you win the case or walk free.
With the rise of the number of people taking their self-defense into their own hands and becoming legal concealed carry permit holders in Dist of Columbia there have been a corresponding number of companies starting to offer different types of self-defense insurance.
Although upon an initial inspection many of these different programs offered by insurance companies or via websites seem to offer good coverage. There is one common element amongst all of them, and that is they only pay after you are already in extreme debt, and will not reimburse you in the event of a criminal conviction. Basically, they are nothing more than a different spin on a traditional insurance policy.
The CCW safe program in Dist of Columbia is the first true comprehensive legal service membership that includes not only attorney fees, it also covers and provides for investigators and expert witnesses that work on your behalf, and defend you against criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and administrative actions all stemming from the use of force incident.
Insurance for Self Defense and Concealed Carry In Dist of Columbia Is The Best Choice!
If you do your research you will quickly find out that the CCW Safe legal service membership program in Dist of Columbia outperforms any other self-defense and or legal defense insurance policy offered by anyone in the country.
Chances are when you first decided to carry a Firearm for self-defense you did your research, you decided on the right gun, the right caliber, the right type of ammunition, and the right instructor to teach you how to properly shoot. More than likely you also participated in a specialized class to meet the legal requirements in Dist of Columbia to obtain your concealed carry permit.
Unless you were very fortunate chances are that no one really went over all of the legal ramifications after you pull the trigger, nor did anyone explain to you that even if you did everything to the letter of the law, did it exactly right, you could still be sued in civil court and found liable, even though you're not prosecuted criminally. Yes it does sound absurd but it happens every day in this country.
You must be properly prepared for all eventualities and you must have legal protection in place because if you don't and you are taken to court in Dist of Columbia you could possibly lose everything you have, and everything you could ever hope to have in the future, it could all be taken from you.
CCW Safe’s Membership In Dist of Columbia Is The Best Option For Self Defense Insurance
The single best way that you can prepare for any legal action against you in a self-defense situation is by becoming a member of CCW Safe's program in Dist of Columbia, it could very well be a decision that you make that you will be thankful for literally for the rest of your life.
When you consider the remarkable low price of the incredible protection you get this truly is one of those no-brainer decisions!
It is possible to purchase a true peace of mind...
CCW Safe's program covers you in Dist of Columbia, and all other 49 states providing that you are legally carrying in a particular state where the self-defense incident takes place and if your CCW or CHL is honored in that state, then you're covered.
Some important points to remember;
- Financial benefits are paid as soon as the fees are actually incurred
- There is no financial limits on the cost of your legal defense
- Single membership is just $179.00
- CCW Safe's plan covers use of all legal firearms
- One very unique component is that the plan also covers any weapon or weaponless use of force!
- Remember, the plan also pays for attorney fees, specialized investigators and any needed expert witnesses.
- There simply is no other product available on the market that even comes close to what CCW Safe has put together in their comprehensive self-defense legal service membership program.
FOR THOSE WITH VALID STATE CCW PERMITS ONLY
FOR ACTIVE OR RETIRED MILITARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WITH CCW PERMITS
NON - PERMIT PLANS
Constitutional Carry | Home Defense Plan | Civil Liability
The CCW Safe HR218 plan was developed specifically for active, retired, and former law enforcement officers that meet the requirements for the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA), also known as HR218.
To learn more about ALL of CCW Safe’s Self Defense and Home Defense Protection Programs or to Purchase a plan please follow the link, CCW Safe Also has Monthly Payments Available CLICK HERE
#CCWSafeSelfDefensePlansDist of Columbia #Dist of ColumbiaConcealedCarryWeaponsPermit #NRA #Guns #Firearms #Handguns #Dist of ColumbiaGunInsurance
#Dist of ColumbiaShootingInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaSelfdefense #Dist of ColumbiaConcealedCarryInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaCCWsafe #Dist of ColumbiaConstitutionalCarryPlan #Dist of ColumbiaSelfProtectionInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaCCWSafeInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaSelfdefenseCoveragePlans
#USPrecisionDefense #Dist of ColumbiaSelfDefenseInsuranceForConcealedCarry #SelfDefenseInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaConcealedcarry #Dist of ColumbiaCCWInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaConstitutionalCarryInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaOpencarry #Dist of ColumbiaCCW
#Dist of ColumbiaHR218Insurance #Dist of ColumbiaHR218SelfDefenseInsurance #Dist of ColumbiaHR218
In Washington, D.C., all firearms must be registered with the police, by the terms of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975.
The same law also prohibited the possession of handguns, even in private citizens' own homes, unless they were registered before 1976. However, the handgun ban was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller. The Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment acknowledges and guarantees the right of the individual to possess and carry firearms, and therefore D.C.'s ban on handguns was unconstitutional. This was considered a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court and a very significant advancement of the 2nd amendment and gun rights.
Following the Heller decision, the Washington D.C. City Council enacted a set of rules regulating the possession of handguns in citizens' homes. In addition to each handgun being registered with the police, the rules require that D.C. residents undergo a background check and submit fingerprints. The firearms registry photographs the applicant. Residents must take an online gun safety course, and pass a written test on the District's gun laws. Residents must also declare where it will be kept
The District of Columbia does not permit the concealed carrying of firearms. Open carry is also prohibited. A lawsuit was filed on August 6, 2009, to compel the district to issue permits to carry weapons, it is also expected that with the recent 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling forcing the state of Illinois to make concealed Carry available to its citizens that DC will be compelled to follow suit.
Washinton DC’s insane gun laws; Back in January, 2013 Benjamin Srigley, a 39-year-old man who lives in Washington, DC. Benjamin Srigley saw three pitbulls attack 11-year-old Jayeon Simon as the boy rode his bike. Benjamin Srigley ran into his house and grabbed his handgun. He shot one of the three dogs. A nearby police officer heard the shots and once arriving on the scene, shot the other two dogs .Rather than being treated as a hero, an investigation was opened into Benjamin Srigley's "offenses." By DC law "Possession of an unregistered firearm or ammunition in the District is punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine, and prosecutors said Mr. Srigley could have faced up to seven criminal charges in the case." Seven criminal charges? For saving a boy's life?
US Precision Defense support SANE and fair gun law, lean more on our political news feed on our websites home page.
With the recent decision of the 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling regarding the ban on CCW’s in Illinois there has been a lot of debate as to whether the same will apply to Washington DC; the US Supreme court answered a technical question about its 2008 ruling, concerning whether the federal right it recognized (the District of Columbia is on federal land) also applied to the 50 states. By another 5-4 vote, the court said it does. While the court's five-member conservative majority has been bold about declaring a Second Amendment right to have a gun, it has been less than clear about which gun-control laws violate that right. In fact, the court did not actually strike down Chicago's law, which is effectively a near ban on the possession of handguns by private citizens. It simply asked a lower court to take another look at it.
In looking at the history of US Supreme Court rulings; The court concluded, “We have found no historical evidence that the Second Amendment was intended to convey militia power to the states, limit the federal government’s power to maintain a standing army, or applies only to members of a select militia while on active duty. All of the evidence indicates that the Second Amendment, like other parts of the Bill of Rights, applies to and protects individual Americans. We find that the history of the Second Amendment reinforces the plain meaning of its text, namely that it protects individual Americans in their right to keep and bear arms whether or not they are a member of a select militia or performing active military service or training.”
If there’s any place in America where everything must go smoothly, it’s Washington D.C., the city that runs the country. And that’s true of gun control, which went as smoothly in Washington D.C. as it has everywhere else. The formula is simple. Ban guns. Encourage criminals.
The gun ban had an unintended effect: It emboldened criminals because they knew that law-abiding District residents were unarmed and powerless to defend themselves. Violent crime increased after the law was enacted, with homicides rising to 369 in 1988, from 188 in 1976 when the ban started. By 1993, annual homicides had reached 454.
Since the gun ban was struck down, murders in the District have steadily gone down, from 186 in 2008 to 88 in 2012, the lowest number since the law was enacted in 1976. The decline resulted from a variety of factors, but losing the gun ban certainly did not produce the rise in murders that many might have expected. Follow the latest on Gun owners’ rights by being a member of US Precision Defense.